Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
  • The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.

Key Quotes:

  • "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
  • "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."​

What They Discuss:

  • Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
  • The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
  • It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
  • The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
  • The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.

What They Recommend:

  • Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
  • The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
  • The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.

This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden Has Massively Overdrawn America’s Account with Blank Checks to Ukraine
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden Has Massively Overdrawn America’s Account with Blank Checks to Ukraine

Summary
  • The Biden administration's latest request for $61 billion for Ukraine would bring the total U.S. support since 2022 to nearly $200 billion.
  • The authors question the feasibility of a Ukrainian victory and the U.S.'s ability to sustain financial support given its fiscal challenges.|
Libertarian
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Common Good Diplomacy: A Framework for Stable U.S.–China Relations
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

Common Good Diplomacy: A Framework for Stable U.S.–China Relations

Summary
  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.
Bipartisan
Issue Brief
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The implications of the AI boom for nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The implications of the AI boom for nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Generative AI tools could enhance disinformation, recruitment, and intelligence efforts by producing convincing fake content, as well as cybercrimes like extortion and cyber-espionage.
  • Predictive AI could be used to optimize weaponry and personnel deployment, reducing tactical advantages of state actors.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Emergency Arms Sale to Israel Undermines Accountability
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Emergency Arms Sale to Israel Undermines Accountability

Summary
  • The emergency arms sale to Israel undermines effective oversight of arms transfers and contradicts the Biden administration’s policies on civilian protection and human rights.
  • Congress should preserve oversight over weapons transfers and consider amendments requiring reporting on compliance with U.S. and international law and protection of civilians.
Progressive
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Claudine Gay Is Just the Start
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Claudine Gay Is Just the Start

Summary
  • AEI scholar Samuel J. Abrams argues that while Gay's resignation is a step forward, it is insufficient in addressing the broader issues within Harvard and other collegiate institutions regarding DEI policies.
  • Abrams criticizes Harvard's DEI bureaucracy, accusing it of promoting hatred toward Jews and suppressing free speech.
Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.