Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
  • The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.

Key Quotes:

  • "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
  • "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."​

What They Discuss:

  • Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
  • The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
  • It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
  • The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
  • The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.

What They Recommend:

  • Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
  • The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
  • The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.

This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Colleges’ Inexcusable Cowardice on Hamas

Summary
  • AEI expert Samuel J. Abrams argues that the silence or delayed response of college administrations in the face of Hamas's attacks is a moral failure and indicative of a broader issue of anti-Semitism on campuses.
  • Abrams writes that colleges and universities should swiftly condemn actions taken by Hamas against innocent Israelis, and administrators and presidents who fail to confront these issues should step down.
Conservative
Blog
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough

Summary
  • Hudson scholar John P. Walters writes that the October 7 attacks in Israel by Hamas showcases the need for a more proactive approach to deterrence beyond passive defense strategies.
  • Walters criticizes U.S. policy towards Israel, suggesting it has encouraged a passive defense approach and hindered proactive deterrence.
Conservative
Report
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Is US security dependent on limiting China’s economic growth?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Is US security dependent on limiting China’s economic growth?

Summary
  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
Leans Left
Research
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
5 major risks confronting the global economy in 2024
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

5 major risks confronting the global economy in 2024

Summary
  • Despite recent resilience, the global economy faces significant risks in 2024, with geopolitical tensions being the biggest risk factor.
  • The interconnected nature of these risks to the global, such as climate change, could lead to widespread economic challenges.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Risk & Forecasting
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Democracy v. the Constitution in the Trump Case
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Democracy v. the Constitution in the Trump Case

Summary
  • AEI scholar Peter J. Wallison writes that the Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy, as well as the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.
Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.