Heritage Foundation
·
Published
January 30, 2025
Share this article

Summary

President Trump's questioning of the birthright citizenship clause is based on a historical interpretation of the 14th Amendment. This perspective suggests that citizenship was never intended for all individuals born in the U.S. without consideration of parental status, per commentary from Heritage Foundation.

President Trump's questioning of the birthright citizenship clause is based on a historical interpretation of the 14th Amendment. This perspective suggests that citizenship was never intended for all individuals born in the U.S. without consideration of parental status, per commentary from Heritage Foundation.

The issue:  

The core challenge revolves around the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states that only those born "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. are citizens. Historical context indicates that the amendment was designed to eliminate race-based citizenship barriers rather than to guarantee citizenship for all born in the U.S.

Go deeper:  

Legislative history underscores that children born to non-citizens owe allegiance to their parents' home countries, thereby precluding automatic U.S. citizenship. Iconic court cases like Elk v. Wilkins (1884) reinforce the view that the Supreme Court has historically limited the scope of birthright citizenship. The president's order seeks to realign federal policy to adhere to this original intent of the 14th Amendment.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change

Summary

The fires in Los Angeles highlight the urgent security threat posed by climate change, which is reshaping national security paradigms. This disconnect limits the government's response to climate disasters, putting public trust and political stability at risk, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Journalism needs better representation to counter AI
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Journalism needs better representation to counter AI

Summary

Journalism is currently facing significant challenges related to staff layoffs and the rise of artificial intelligence. As automation increases, the representation of diverse voices is at risk, impacting the quality and integrity of reporting, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump's threatened tariffs projected to damage economies of US, Canada, Mexico, and China

Summary

Trump's threatened tariffs could lead to significant economic harm for the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and China. These tariffs, if implemented, threaten to slow economic growth and increase inflation across all involved nations, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Commentary
·
Global Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.