Brookings
·
Published
October 3, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.

Overview:

This written debate by Brookings experts, Cameron F. Kerry, Mary E. Lovely, Pavneet Singh, Liza Tobin, Ryan Hass, Patricia M. Kim, and Emilie Kimball, dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.

  • The debate explores the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, focusing on economic, diplomatic, military, and technological aspects.
  • It examines the implications of China's growth strategies and the potential responses by the United States.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is not the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) economic growth, per se, that poses a risk to U.S. national security, but rather the zero-sum means by which the regime in Beijing continues to achieve that growth, as well as the autocratic end goals that growth facilitates." - Liza Tobin
  2. "The time when the United States alone had the power to shape the trajectory of Chinese economic growth is long past." - Cameron F. Kerry

What They Discuss:

  • The debate addresses whether China’s economic growth presents a risk to America’s national security and if the U.S. should act to limit this growth.
  • It discusses the impact of China's economic tactics on global supply chains and market competition.
  • The experts consider the effectiveness of U.S. policies aimed at countering China's economic strategies.
  • They explore the potential consequences of slowing China's growth on U.S. interests and global stability.
  • The article also delves into the strategic importance of technology and innovation in the U.S.-China competition.

What They Recommend:

  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth.
  • Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
  • The U.S. needs to bolster its economic strengths and correct existing misalignments to compete effectively with China.
  • A more nuanced and targeted approach towards China is recommended, differentiating between China's rise and specific policies of concern.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate highlights the complexity of the U.S.-China economic and strategic relationship.
  • It underscores the need for the U.S. to adapt its policies to effectively manage and compete with China's growing influence.
  • The recommendations suggest a strategic focus on protecting U.S. interests and enhancing competitiveness in key areas.​

This is a brief overview of the debate hosted by Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary

William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.

The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump, Harris, and All the Wrong Ways to Do Tax Reform

Summary
  • Adam N. Michel at Cato Institute argues that tax policy's prominence in the presidential campaign is due to the impending expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and the candidates' proposals for new special-interest tax breaks that complicate and increase the tax code's complexity.
  • The report asserts that while there is bipartisan support for extending most of the expiring tax cuts, proposed targeted benefits for tips, families, homeowners, domestic production, and seniors will further complicate the tax system and pose significant fiscal challenges.
Libertarian
Policy Analysis
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal
Urban Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Breaking Down the Biden Administration’s National Rent Stabilization Proposal

Summary
  • Urban Institute experts write that the Biden administration's rent stabilization proposal aims to cap annual rent increases at 5% for units owned by large landlords, conditioned on maintaining existing tax breaks, aiming to stabilize housing and protect tenants from eviction or displacement.
  • The experts argue that while the proposal could make more units affordable for low-income residents, it may also reduce the overall supply of rental units as landlords might convert properties or avoid entering the market, potentially driving up rents for uncontrolled units.
Liberal
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Is Kamala Harris leading Donald Trump in the presidential race?

Summary
  • Experts at Brookings argue that Kamala Harris has regained lost ground for the Democrats, erasing the "enthusiasm gap" and leading in both national and key swing state polls against Donald Trump.
  • They examine the reliability of poll averages, highlighting historical underestimation of Trump’s support and the necessity for Harris to maintain significant momentum to secure victory.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Kamala Harris’s chances in November could hinge on a women’s voting surge

Summary
  • William H. Frey at Brookings argues that Vice President Kamala Harris's nomination as the Democratic presidential candidate has invigorated the race, with a particular impact on female voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

  • The analysis reviews that women's votes were crucial in recent elections, highlighting how post-Roe v. Wade changes and Harris’s advocacy on women's issues could lead to a significant voting surge, potentially favoring her in the 2024 election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.