Brookings
·
Published
September 11, 2024
Share this article

Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading.

  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

Overview: 

This article was written by William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. 

  • Kamala Harris used the debate to introduce herself to voters, emphasizing her middle-class background and experience as a prosecutor.
  • Donald Trump focused on separating himself from his party's extreme policies and addressing key voter concerns like the economy and abortion.

Key Quotes:

  • “From the very first minutes of the debate, it was clear that she knew she had to define herself and that she did—as a child of the middle class who, in contrast to Trump, was not given $400 million to start a business.”
  • “Trump tried to distance himself from the extremes, arguing that he would approve of abortions for rape and incest and even going so far as to say the Florida six-week ban is too short.”

What They Discuss:

  • Kamala Harris faced three main challenges: introducing herself to unfamiliar voters, explaining her shifting positions on key issues, and proving her capability to serve as president.
  • Harris consistently brought up her prosecutorial background to counter claims of being weak on crime.
  • Trump needed to convey he wasn't obsessed with conspiracy theories and to appeal to swing voters.
  • Trump’s repeated focus on illegal immigration highlighted a core issue for his campaign but may have limited his broader appeal.
  • Abortion emerged as a particularly controversial topic, with Harris attacking restrictive state policies and Trump attempting to moderate his stance.

What They Recommend:

  • Harris should continue defining herself clearly to voters and emphasize her prosecutorial experience.
  • Trump should stick to script on key issues like the economy and avoid deviating into conspiracy theories.
  • Both candidates need to clarify their positions on contentious issues like abortion and immigration to appeal to undecided voters.

Key Takeaways:

  • Kamala Harris' debate performance likely energized her supporters and further introduced her to voters who didn't know her well.
  • Trump's focus on illegal immigration and attempts to moderate his position on abortion had mixed success in broadening his appeal.
  • The debate could boost Harris' campaign, but the final outcome will depend on continued voter engagement and state-specific efforts.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government

Summary

The federal government's effort to downsize may lead to increased privatization and automation. This shift raises concerns about the accessibility and fairness of services for Americans reliant on government support, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary

Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. SupremeCourt Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.

Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.