Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Published
September 14, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.

Overview:

This report by Jake Werner from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft discusses "Common Good Diplomacy" as a framework for stable U.S.-China relations.

  • The report argues that both the U.S. and China, as status quo powers, share an interest in a stable global security environment and an open global economy.
  • It suggests that diplomacy should focus on framing an inclusive global system, focusing on actions that reduce zero-sum constraints.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Rather than seeking to counter every Chinese initiative, U.S. leaders should carefully distinguish between beneficial and damaging outcomes, affirming and building on China’s constructive proposals and managing differences through negotiation rather than polemics and confrontation."
  2. "Working with China to revitalize the international order would not only prevent such a conflict, it would also establish the conditions for healthy forms of both competition and cooperation in the U.S.–China relationship."

What They Discuss:

  • The report examines the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, highlighting the potential for cooperation in areas like climate change, development in the Global South, and reforming international institutions.
  • It emphasizes the need for the U.S. to carefully navigate its approach to China, distinguishing between actions that are beneficial or damaging to global stability.
  • The concept of "Common Good Diplomacy" is proposed as a means to manage differences and build on constructive proposals from both sides.
  • The report critiques the current U.S. approach of countering every Chinese initiative, advocating for a more nuanced strategy.
  • It also addresses the challenges and opportunities in areas like global authority and security, the global economy, and climate change.

What They Recommend:

  • Adopting a diplomatic approach that focuses on building an inclusive global system and reducing zero-sum constraints.
  • Engaging in cooperative efforts with China in areas like climate change, global economic guidelines, and international order reform.
  • Differentiating between Chinese actions that exacerbate tensions and those that contribute to global stability.
  • Pursuing a balanced approach that allows for competition within a rules-based order, avoiding destructive conflict.

Key Takeaways:

  • The report advocates for a strategic approach to U.S.-China relations that balances competition with cooperation.
  • It highlights the importance of recognizing shared interests in a stable global order and the potential for mutually beneficial reforms.
  • The concept of "Common Good Diplomacy" is presented as a framework for stable and constructive U.S.-China relations.

This is a brief overview of Jake Werner's report from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full report.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Forecasting China’s strategy in the Middle East over the next four years

Summary

China is poised to strengthen its political and economic presence in the Middle East over the next four years. This engagement will be motivated primarily by a need to secure energy resources and enhance diplomatic relations, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Invading Mexico Will Not Solve the Cartel Problem

Summary

Invading Mexico will not effectively resolve the cartel problem and may worsen existing issues, such as migration and international relations. Military incursions could undermine bilateral cooperation and fail to yield strategic success, posing significant risks to U.S. interests, per commentary from Cato Institute.

Libertarian
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

Manufacturing employment has grown slowly since returning to pre-pandemic levels

Summary

Manufacturing employment growth in the U.S. has been modest since returning to pre-pandemic levels, indicating underlying weaknesses. This trend suggests that while some gains are highlighted, broad improvements for middle-class workers remain elusive, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

No trade tax is free: Trump’s promised tariffs will hit large flows of electronics, machinery, autos, and chemicals

Summary

President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs will significantly raise prices for many imported goods, especially electronics, machinery, and vehicles. These changes will put financial pressure on American consumers and businesses alike, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.  

Center
Blog
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

The presidential debate accomplished more for Harris than it did for Trump

Summary
  • William A. Galston and Elaine Kamarck at Brookings discuss the importance of presidential debates in addressing voter concerns, highlighting Kamala Harris's effort to define herself and correct misconceptions about her political stance and capabilities.
  • The commentary asserts that Donald Trump's debate performance was inconsistent, often veering off-topic and failing to broaden his appeal beyond his base, indicating a potential challenge for his campaign in attracting new supporters.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.