Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Published
July 31, 2024

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.

Overview:

This article was written by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • The Chinese Communist Party's recent Third Plenum communiqué focused more on supply-side measures than demand-side initiatives, despite widespread consensus that boosting consumption is essential for sustainable growth.
  • Structural, supply-side changes are vital to enhancing consumption’s role in China’s economy, but these are complex and have far-reaching consequences.

Key Quotes:

  • "Beijing has been unable to shift the economy away from its overreliance on investment—and, more recently, on its trade surplus—to maintain high growth rates."
  • "Thanks to these direct and implicit transfers, in other words, China’s extremely competitive manufacturing—and the world’s best transportation and logistical infrastructure—should not be thought of as separate from the country’s extraordinarily low domestic consumption."

What They Discuss:

  • Consumption accounts for approximately 75% of GDP globally, but only about 53-54% in China, with investment constituting 42-43% of GDP.
  • Despite general agreement among economists, China remains heavily reliant on investment rather than consumption for economic growth.
  • Structural transfers in China—such as repressed interest rates and a rigorous credit system—have subsidized businesses and investment at the expense of households.
  • China’s hukou system and other policies have kept wages and household income growth subdued, further limiting consumption.
  • Inefficient investment, particularly in infrastructure, has led to rising local government debt without corresponding economic benefits.

What They Recommend:

  • Implementing fiscal stimulus directed at the demand side would offer a temporary boost to household consumption but is not a sustainable long-term solution due to debt concerns.
  • Gradually reversing structural transfers to allow household income to grow faster than GDP presents a more sustainable, albeit challenging, approach.
  • Reforming inefficient investment practices and ensuring more resources go towards households would support sustainable consumption growth.

Key Takeaways:

  • Boosting consumption in China is a complex challenge deeply intertwined with the country’s overall economic structure.
  • Temporary fiscal measures alone are insufficient; long-term structural changes are necessary to sustainably enhance the role of consumption.
  • Any significant shift in policy could potentially impact China’s manufacturing competitiveness and lead to short-term economic contractions.
  • Structural reforms pose a challenge as they involve redistributing resources from businesses and local governments to households.

This is a brief overview of the article by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Summary
  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.
Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.