Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Published
July 31, 2024

Why Is It So Hard for China to Boost Domestic Demand?

Liberal
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Experts at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argue that China's Third Plenum communiqué remains vague on demand-side measures, even though boosting consumption is widely seen as crucial for sustainable growth.

  • The analysis suggests that despite consensus on the need for stronger consumer demand, Beijing faces challenges in shifting from an investment-driven economy due to long-standing transfers that benefit manufacturing, infrastructure, and local governments at the expense of households.

Overview:

This article was written by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

  • The Chinese Communist Party's recent Third Plenum communiqué focused more on supply-side measures than demand-side initiatives, despite widespread consensus that boosting consumption is essential for sustainable growth.
  • Structural, supply-side changes are vital to enhancing consumption’s role in China’s economy, but these are complex and have far-reaching consequences.

Key Quotes:

  • "Beijing has been unable to shift the economy away from its overreliance on investment—and, more recently, on its trade surplus—to maintain high growth rates."
  • "Thanks to these direct and implicit transfers, in other words, China’s extremely competitive manufacturing—and the world’s best transportation and logistical infrastructure—should not be thought of as separate from the country’s extraordinarily low domestic consumption."

What They Discuss:

  • Consumption accounts for approximately 75% of GDP globally, but only about 53-54% in China, with investment constituting 42-43% of GDP.
  • Despite general agreement among economists, China remains heavily reliant on investment rather than consumption for economic growth.
  • Structural transfers in China—such as repressed interest rates and a rigorous credit system—have subsidized businesses and investment at the expense of households.
  • China’s hukou system and other policies have kept wages and household income growth subdued, further limiting consumption.
  • Inefficient investment, particularly in infrastructure, has led to rising local government debt without corresponding economic benefits.

What They Recommend:

  • Implementing fiscal stimulus directed at the demand side would offer a temporary boost to household consumption but is not a sustainable long-term solution due to debt concerns.
  • Gradually reversing structural transfers to allow household income to grow faster than GDP presents a more sustainable, albeit challenging, approach.
  • Reforming inefficient investment practices and ensuring more resources go towards households would support sustainable consumption growth.

Key Takeaways:

  • Boosting consumption in China is a complex challenge deeply intertwined with the country’s overall economic structure.
  • Temporary fiscal measures alone are insufficient; long-term structural changes are necessary to sustainably enhance the role of consumption.
  • Any significant shift in policy could potentially impact China’s manufacturing competitiveness and lead to short-term economic contractions.
  • Structural reforms pose a challenge as they involve redistributing resources from businesses and local governments to households.

This is a brief overview of the article by Michael Pettis at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.