Brookings
·
Published
August 5, 2024
Share this article

Summary

  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.

Overview:

This article was written by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings.

  • The high cost of infrastructure in the U.S. is partly due to the limited capacity of state departments of transportation (DOTs) and the over-reliance on consultants.
  • Limited competition in the market for government construction contracts also drives up costs.

Key Quotes:

  • “A one standard deviation increase in state capacity (measured by state DOT employment per capita) is correlated with 16% lower costs.”
  • “An additional bidder on a project was associated with 8.3% lower costs, approximately $460,000 for the average project.”

What They Discuss:

  • U.S. infrastructure costs three times as much on a per-mile basis compared to other upper- and middle-income countries.
  • State DOTs report severe understaffing and an over-reliance on consultants, leading to higher costs; a one standard deviation increase in consultant use is associated with 20% higher costs per lane-mile.
  • A lack of competition in the bidding process for government construction contracts further increases costs; enhancing bidder outreach can reduce costs by 17.6%.
  • The performance of individual engineers significantly impacts project costs; replacing a high-cost engineer with a median-cost engineer can reduce costs by 5.3% per mile.
  • Better planning and providing more bid details are associated with lower costs, while frequent change orders due to poor planning lead to higher expenditures.

What They Recommend:

  • Increase the staffing capacity of state DOTs to reduce reliance on costly consultants.
  • Enhance outreach efforts to potential bidders to increase competition and lower costs.
  • Focus on better planning and providing detailed project information to minimize costly change orders.
  • Invest in training and capacity-building for state engineers to ensure more consistent and efficient project management.

Key Takeaways:

  • High U.S. infrastructure costs can be mitigated by strengthening state DOT capacities and encouraging competitive bidding.
  • Proper planning and detailed bidding information can significantly reduce project costs.
  • Addressing staffing and competitive challenges can lead to substantial cost savings on infrastructure projects.

This is a brief overview of the article by Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Summary
  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.
Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Consequences of China’s New Rare Earths Export Restrictions

Summary

New export restrictions imposed by China on rare earth elements have significant implications for U.S. sourcing of these critical materials, particularly for defense technologies. The restrictions require licenses for exports, potentially disrupting supply chains and impacting U.S. firms, especially in the defense sector, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Article
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.