RAND Corporation
·
Published
January 9, 2025
Share this article

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

The issue:  

Many in the U.S. believe allies do not contribute fairly to global security costs, primarily due to a focus on the 2% GDP spending target. However, data shows that 23 of the 32 NATO members met this goal last year, reflecting significant progress over the past decade.

What they recommend:  

No recommendations provided in the commentary.

Go deeper:  

The updated analysis reveals that the U.S. share of global security contributions has decreased from 53% post-Cold War to around 39% in 2023. Notably, Eastern European countries are among the top contributors due to security concerns from Russia. Moreover, using metrics beyond spending, such as capabilities, can inform more tailored support requests from allies.

This is a brief overview of a commentary from RAND Corporation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full commentary.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How Trump Sees Allies and Partners
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

How Trump Sees Allies and Partners

Summary

With Donald Trump's potential return to the White House, global partners must adapt to a shift toward an "America First" foreign policy. This approach prioritizes U.S. interests and presents a more unpredictable stance towards international relations, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Seeding Security: Why Agrobiodiversity Loss Threatens National Security

Summary

Agrobiodiversity loss poses significant risks to food security and may undermine political stability. Protecting diverse agricultural species is crucial for sustaining food production and responding to environmental challenges, per commentary from Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Centrist
Commentary
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.

Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warns that the formula used by the White House drastically overstates the trade barriers imposed by foreign countries — and risks harming the U.S. economy.

Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats

Summary

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant challenges in regaining favor after recent electoral losses, as only 33 percent of Americans view the party positively. The party's struggle to adapt and connect with voters indicates a pressing need for strategic changes to compete effectively in future elections, per commentary from American Enterprise Institute.

Conservative
Op-Ed
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.