Summary

  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan, with assistance from Noah Greene, from the Center for a New American Security (CNAS).
  • It focuses on the escalating geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China, particularly in the context of military artificial intelligence (AI).
  • The paper explores the potential strategic risks and management strategies in the sphere of military AI amid increasing tensions.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Many of the most practical uses for military AI in the near term will be for purposes that are relatively mundane but could help the PLA use resources more efficiently."
  2. "The net effect, however, of multiple states compressing their decision-making timelines due to AI-augmented processes could be a global security environment that is faster-paced and more prone to miscalculation."

What They Discuss:

  • The rapid development of AI technologies for military applications and its potential impact on the U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry.
  • China’s strategic investment in AI as a crucial element for its future military modernization and global technological leadership.
  • The potential for military AI to inadvertently increase strategic risks and undermine stability in U.S.-China relations.
  • Specific pathways through which military AI applications might affect the security dynamics between the U.S. and China, including in decision-making and information domains.
  • The challenges and obstacles China might face in integrating AI into the People’s Liberation Army, and the potential for strategic surprises for the U.S.

What They Recommend:

  • Developing and implementing best practices and norms for responsible military AI use.
  • Engaging with allies and negotiating risk reduction measures with China related to military AI.
  • Making military AI a fundamental aspect of diplomatic discussions with China, especially in the context of nuclear weapons and strategic stability.
  • Prioritizing intelligence gathering and analysis on China’s military AI capabilities for better assessment and policy-making.

Key Takeaways:

  • Military AI development is a critical factor in the intensifying strategic competition between the U.S. and China.
  • Proper management and international cooperation are essential to mitigate the strategic risks posed by military AI.
  • Balancing innovation in military AI with responsible usage and risk reduction strategies is crucial for global security and stability.

This is a brief overview of Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan's work from the Center for a New American Security (CNAS). For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit

Summary
  • Robert Benson at Center for American Progress writes that the 75th NATO Summit underscored the urgency of paving a clear membership path for Ukraine and strengthening Eastern Europe's defenses against Russian aggression, marking vital steps for the alliance's future.
  • The column asserts that Washington must ensure all NATO members meet their defense spending commitments and enhance cybersecurity to tackle sophisticated threats, while also expanding NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.
Progressive
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.