Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
  • The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.

Key Quotes:

  • "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
  • "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."​

What They Discuss:

  • Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
  • The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
  • It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
  • The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
  • The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.

What They Recommend:

  • Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
  • The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
  • The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.

This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Summary
  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate

Summary
  • Brookings expert Samantha Gross writes that reducing oil production in the U.S. will not significantly impact global oil production, as other producers can easily fill the gap.
  • Changing the transportation system from gasoline and diesel to electricity is key to reducing oil demand and greenhouse gas emissions.
Leans Left
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?

Summary
  • Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
  • The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War
German Marshall Fund
·
Nov 18, 2023

Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The U.S. and Europe's pro-Israel stance in the war in Gaza, coupled with their response to Ukraine, is leading to global criticism and a potential shift in international relations, isolating them from non-Western countries.
  • This situation offers autocratic nations like China, Iran, and Russia an opportunity to increase their influence, exploiting perceptions of Western moral inconsistency and opportunism.
Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.