Cato Institute
·
Published
December 28, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Robert A. Levy, discussing the complex issue of Donald Trump's potential disqualification from running for president in 2024.
  • The author critically examines the legal and constitutional implications surrounding the disqualification debate, focusing on the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment and its application.

Key Quotes:

  • "No person shall … hold any office … who, having previously [served] … as an officer of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection."
  • "The US Constitution is not a legal code; it’s a set of broad principles that implement a framework for governance."​

What They Discuss:

  • Levy analyzes Colorado's attempt to disqualify Trump from the 2024 ballot and the subsequent legal challenges leading to the U.S. Supreme Court's involvement.
  • The article addresses critical legal questions, including who has standing to file suit and whether states can define "engaging in insurrection."
  • It scrutinizes whether the term "Officer of the United States" in the Fourteenth Amendment applies to elected officials like Trump.
  • The distinction between disqualification from holding office and running for office is explored, with reference to various state court rulings.
  • The article considers the constitutional framework for governance and the potential political repercussions of disqualifying Trump without a criminal conviction.

What They Recommend:

  • Levy suggests a careful interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, emphasizing its historical context and legal precedents.
  • The author recommends that the Supreme Court provide clarity on the application of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate over Trump's disqualification centers on constitutional interpretation, especially the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's decision will have significant implications for electoral law and the definition of insurrection in a political context.
  • The issue raises broader questions about the balance between legal standards and political decision-making in the American democratic process.

This is a brief overview of Robert A. Levy's work from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.