American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
October 11, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • Abrams argues students widely support the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.

Overview:

This article by Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing that students are not the primary problem when it comes to restrictions on speech.

  • Abrams emphasizes that the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • The article highlights that most students value free speech and are open to diverse viewpoints.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is the college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices that hinder the classical liberal education experience."
  2. "About 61 percent of students often feel intimidated to share their ideas, opinions, or beliefs in class because they are different than those of their professors."​

What They Discuss:

  • The decline of viewpoint diversity and open debate in colleges, leading to ideological monoculture.
  • The misconception that student mobs are the main cause of speech limitations, while the role of college administrators is more significant.
  • Data from the Buckley Institute showing that a majority of students value free speech but feel pressured to self-censor.
  • The support among students for the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.
  • The need to educate students on the value of free speech and diverse opinions for a better education and future leadership.

What They Recommend:

  • Supporting students' desire to learn and question, rather than focusing on a minority that seeks to limit liberal education.
  • Promoting the fact that most students understand the importance of listening to different opinions for a liberal education.
  • Encouraging students to be key players in pushing back against the impulse to silence debate.
  • Backing students in their learning and not blaming them for the problems of expression on campus.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The article challenges the narrative that students are the main impediment to free speech on campuses.
  • It highlights the need to address the role of college administrators in creating a restrictive environment.
  • The article underscores the importance of fostering an educational culture that values open debate and diverse viewpoints.

This is a brief overview of Samuel J. Abrams' article from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What to watch in Ukraine in 2024
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

What to watch in Ukraine in 2024

Summary
  • Brookings experts are watching the EU's capability to fund Ukraine, NATO's strategy for integrating Ukraine, and the possibility of either Russia or Ukraine breaking through stalemate on the battlefied.
  • They are also watching Western defense industry's ability to match Russia's, the international community's potential appropriation of Russian assets for Ukraine's rebuilding, and the influence of the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?

Summary
  • Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
  • The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Ukraine’s Desperate Hour: The World Needs a Russian Defeat
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Ukraine’s Desperate Hour: The World Needs a Russian Defeat

Summary
  • AEI expert Hal Brands writes that the war in Ukraine is a critical test of democratic resilience against authoritarian forces.
  • The outcome of this conflict could either reinforce or erode the current global order, depending on the sustained commitment of democratic nations.
Conservative
Op-Ed
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
AI can strengthen U.S. democracy—and weaken it
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

AI can strengthen U.S. democracy—and weaken it

Summary
  • AI has the potential to improve election administration but requires vigilant monitoring for risks such as phishing attacks, misinformation, and potential bias in voter rolls.
  • Policymakers, advocates, and citizens need to stay informed about technological advancements to harness AI's positive potential.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Helping Ukraine Is Forcing the United States to Produce More Weapons
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Helping Ukraine Is Forcing the United States to Produce More Weapons

Summary
  • The U.S. is increasing its production of artillery rounds, with plans to produce more than 80,000 rounds per month next year and potentially 100,000 shells per month by 2025.
  • Supporting Ukraine is pushing the American defense industrial base to produce high quantities of weapons in a short amount of time across various states.
Conservative
Policy Brief
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.