American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
October 11, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • Abrams argues students widely support the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.

Overview:

This article by Samuel J. Abrams at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) discusses the issue of free speech on college campuses, arguing that students are not the primary problem when it comes to restrictions on speech.

  • Abrams emphasizes that the real issue lies with college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, which contribute to a culture of censorship and fear.
  • The article highlights that most students value free speech and are open to diverse viewpoints.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is the college administrators and diversity, equity, and inclusion offices that hinder the classical liberal education experience."
  2. "About 61 percent of students often feel intimidated to share their ideas, opinions, or beliefs in class because they are different than those of their professors."​

What They Discuss:

  • The decline of viewpoint diversity and open debate in colleges, leading to ideological monoculture.
  • The misconception that student mobs are the main cause of speech limitations, while the role of college administrators is more significant.
  • Data from the Buckley Institute showing that a majority of students value free speech but feel pressured to self-censor.
  • The support among students for the First Amendment and open debate, even if some ideas may be uncomfortable.
  • The need to educate students on the value of free speech and diverse opinions for a better education and future leadership.

What They Recommend:

  • Supporting students' desire to learn and question, rather than focusing on a minority that seeks to limit liberal education.
  • Promoting the fact that most students understand the importance of listening to different opinions for a liberal education.
  • Encouraging students to be key players in pushing back against the impulse to silence debate.
  • Backing students in their learning and not blaming them for the problems of expression on campus.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The article challenges the narrative that students are the main impediment to free speech on campuses.
  • It highlights the need to address the role of college administrators in creating a restrictive environment.
  • The article underscores the importance of fostering an educational culture that values open debate and diverse viewpoints.

This is a brief overview of Samuel J. Abrams' article from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why does building and maintaining highways in the US cost so much?

Summary
  • Comfort Oshagbemi and David Wessel at Brookings examine why the U.S. spends substantially more on transportation infrastructure compared to other countries, highlighting limited state DOT capacity and over-reliance on consultants as key cost-drivers.
  • The authors argue that limited competition and insufficient bidder outreach in the market for government construction contracts contribute to higher infrastructure costs in the U.S., and increasing bidder outreach and improving project planning can significantly reduce these costs.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump has big plans for climate and energy policy, but can he implement them?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump has big plans for climate and energy policy, but can he implement them?

Summary
  • Samantha Gross and Louison Sall at Brookings argue that Donald Trump advocates for a shift in U.S. energy policy, focusing on fossil fuels, reducing regulations, and opposing renewable energy initiatives to lower energy costs and achieve "energy dominance."
  • The article asserts that Trump's ability to implement his energy agenda depends on Congress and the courts, with recent Supreme Court decisions potentially aiding his deregulatory efforts in a second term.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Assessing Israel’s Strike on Iran

Summary
  • Israel conducted a precision strike on an Iranian air defense system, signaling its capability and restraint to avoid broader conflict.
  • The attack was a response to an unprecedented direct missile and drone attack by Iran on Israeli soil, marking a significant escalation in their long-standing tensions.

Centrist
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.