Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Published
November 17, 2023

Rethinking Technology Transfer Policy toward China

Centrist
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Share this article

Summary

  • Current methods like export controls are not enough to change China's practices on stolen technology, and the West needs to work together prevent this.
  • The article emphasizes a coordinated diplomatic effort to make China a responsible participant in global markets, focusing on reducing China's unfair trade behaviors and holding it accountable for its actions.

Overview:

This report by James Andrew Lewis at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) discusses the need for a new strategy in the West's technology transfer policy toward China. The report examines the strategic risks posed by China's commercial and technology practices and suggests that a collective approach is necessary to compel China to become a responsible participant in global markets.

Key Points:

  1. China's technology practices create strategic risks, and the Western response has been inadequate in protecting interests and compelling China to change.
  2. A collective approach is needed to deny China the ability to export products of illicitly acquired technology and to engage in a sustained diplomatic effort.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "The greatest leverage will come from a collective approach to deny China the ability to export the products of illicitly acquired technology."
  2. "Managing technology transfer to China is a central strategic consideration for Western countries."

What They Discuss:

  • The importance of technology as a key determinant of national power and its role in international relations.
  • The need to rebuild the technology and trade relationship with China to make it fair and trustworthy.
  • The challenges in managing technology transfer to China, including the need for concrete steps to repair relations.
  • Recommendations for a new approach, including denying China the benefits of illicit activities and extending the notion of buying from trustworthy suppliers.
  • The need for mechanisms to hold China accountable and policies that restrict China’s ability to exploit Western markets.​

What They Recommend:

  • Articulating a consistent message to China and the international community on required changes by China.
  • Measurable reductions in illicit or predatory behavior by China.
  • Efforts to accelerate Western innovation, with continued interaction with Chinese firms and researchers under certain conditions.
  • Policy and regulation in Western countries to allow interaction with China, subject to measures that restrict exploitation.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The report highlights the need for a coordinated and comprehensive diplomatic response to redefine interactions with China.
  • It emphasizes the importance of technology in the strategic competition with China and the need for a sustainable policy.
  • The recommendations aim to balance the need for continued interaction with China while protecting Western interests and encouraging responsible participation by China in the global economy.

This is a brief overview of the report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full report.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along

Summary
  • Carnegie Endowment expert Nikita Smagin writes that the Gaza conflict has reinforced Russia's belief in the correctness of its foreign policy approach, particularly in relation to the Western-centric international system.
  • Russia views the conflict as an opportunity to further its geopolitical interests, especially amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Liberal
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power
Goldman Sachs Global Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power

Summary
  • Goldman Sachs Global Institute estimates AI could contribute 1.5% to annual productivity growth over a ten-year period, lifting global GDP by nearly $7 trillion.
  • U.S. and China are top AI competitors, but geopolitical swing states like India, Japan, Israel, UAE, and South Korea can form "innovation blocs" and cooperate with each other.
Private Sector
Research
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation

Summary
  • Hezbollah is a politically-powerful force within Lebanon, and now serves as Iran's equal partner and "most successful and lethal export".
  • While Hezbollah and Hamas are on opposite sides of the Shia-Sunni divide, both groups find common ground under Iranian support and being anti-Israeli, anti-American, and anti-Western.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary
  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.