Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Overview:  

This article was written by Lindsey McLendon at the Center for American Progress.

• Project 2025 is a proposed policy agenda by the Heritage Foundation that aims to dismantle the American system of checks and balances by exerting control over local district attorneys (DAs) and their prosecutorial discretion.
• The policy focuses heavily on enforcing far-right measures, such as severe abortion restrictions, by using federal authority to compel local officials to prosecute according to their agenda, significantly impacting the American legal landscape.

​

Key Quotes:  

• "Project 2025 is an authoritarian playbook to systematically dismantle the checks and balances framework upon which American democracy is built."
• "Project 2025 intends to leverage the threat of action by the U.S. Department of Justice against these local elected officials to ensure far-right policies are enforced according to the satisfaction of extreme, right-wing officials."

​

What They Discuss:

• There are nearly 2,300 locally elected DAs in the United States responsible for prosecutorial decisions based on community priorities. Project 2025 would undermine this by having the U.S. Department of Justice take action against non-compliant DAs.
• The initiative includes enforcing extreme laws, particularly criminalizing abortion, with severe penalties for medical providers, aiming to curtail fundamental American freedoms.
• States with high maternal mortality rates, like Florida, Georgia, and Texas, have already seen increased abortion-related criminalization, which Project 2025 seeks to extend further.
• In 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis removed district attorneys who refused to prosecute abortion-related cases, setting a precedent that Project 2025 aims to replicate at a national level.
• Project 2025 could lead to further closures of maternity wards and a decline in healthcare professionals willing to work in states with strict abortion laws, exacerbating the crisis in reproductive healthcare.

​

What They Recommend:

• Highlighting and opposing measures within Project 2025 that threaten local prosecutorial independence and the broader judicial system.
• Advocating for maintaining the autonomy of local district attorneys to ensure justice is administered based on community needs rather than a centralized, far-right agenda.
• Raising awareness about the implications of criminalizing abortion care on maternal health and working to protect reproductive rights and access to healthcare services.

​

Key Takeaways:

• Project 2025 poses a significant threat to the integrity of the American legal system by centralizing prosecutorial power and enforcing extreme right-wing laws.
• By targeting district attorneys, the policy aims to imbue local legal systems with an agenda that could severely restrict fundamental freedoms and exacerbate healthcare crises.
• The proposal sets a concerning precedent for removing local elected officials, undermining democratic norms and allowing for political retribution.
• Protecting the independence of local prosecutors is crucial to preserving the checks and balances foundational to U.S. democracy.

​

This is a brief overview of the article by Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.