Special Competitive Studies Project
·
Published
April 1, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • National strategy plan proposes "biotech moonshots", global biotech standards, and securing biotech platforms against rival nations, especially China.
  • The plan stresses treating genomic data as a strategic resource and highlights the potential of biotechnology to revolutionize sectors like health and agriculture.

Overview:

Authors: Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP)

Publishing Date: April 23, 2023

Publishing Organization: Special Competitive Studies Project|

Executive Summary:

The Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP) has released a comprehensive National Action Plan to establish U.S. leadership in biotechnology. This plan outlines strategic initiatives to harness biotechnology's transformative potential for national security, economy, society, and healthcare.

Background:

Biotechnology, a multi-trillion dollar sector, is pivotal in transforming industries like agriculture, health, industrials, materials, and energy. The U.S. currently leads in genetic engineering and molecular biology, but faces competition from countries like China. This plan is part of a broader effort by SCSP to enhance America's competitiveness in emerging technologies.

Issue Description:

The U.S. is at a critical juncture in securing its biotech future. Key challenges include maintaining global leadership, competing with nations like China, integrating biotech across various sectors, and managing the transition from lab breakthroughs to commercialization.

Policy Options:

  1. Investing in Biotech Moonshots: Focusing on projects like the Annotated Non-Human Genome Project and National Medshield.
  2. Strengthening Biotech Infrastructure: Enhancing domestic biomanufacturing capabilities and aligning the biotech standards ecosystem.
  3. Empowering Innovation Ecosystem: Establishing University Centers of Excellence and expanding biomanufacturing institutes.
  4. Building Global Bionet: Creating an early warning system for bio-related incidents.
  5. Developing Talent: Growing a skilled biotech workforce and attracting global talent.

Policy Recommendations:

  • R&D Investment: Significant investment in biotech research and development.
  • Public-Private Collaboration: Strengthening partnerships between government, academia, and industry.
  • Regulatory Framework: Updating regulations to foster innovation and competitiveness.
  • Global Leadership: Leading global efforts in setting biotech standards and ethics.
  • Security Protocols: Implementing stringent security measures to safeguard biotech advancements.

Conclusion:

The National Action Plan for U.S. Leadership in Biotechnology is a strategic blueprint for securing America's biotech future. It emphasizes the need for substantial investment, innovative policy-making, and global collaboration. Success in these endeavors will ensure U.S. leadership in biotechnology, benefiting national security, economic growth, and global health.

This policy brief is a high-level summary and does not encompass all the details of the comprehensive plan. For a full understanding, it is recommended to review the entire National Action Plan document.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Domestic Deployment of the Military: The Past, Present, and Potential Future

Summary

In exploring how military deployment could shape domestic governance, recent discussions highlight potential risks under the Trump administration. The report indicates that such actions, unless carefully monitored, could undermine constitutional safeguards and public safety, per commentary from Center for American Progress.

Progressive
Report
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Denial Without Disaster—Keeping a U.S.-China Conflict over Taiwan Under the Nuclear Threshold
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Denial Without Disaster—Keeping a U.S.-China Conflict over Taiwan Under the Nuclear Threshold

Summary

The U.S. must navigate the complexities of a potential Taiwan conflict concerning China while preventing nuclear escalation. The evolving nature of China's nuclear capabilities demands a more nuanced approach from the U.S. military, especially regarding its operational strategies, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How federal layoffs set the stage for greater privatization and automation of the US government

Summary

The federal government's effort to downsize may lead to increased privatization and automation. This shift raises concerns about the accessibility and fairness of services for Americans reliant on government support, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump 2.0: A Survival Guide for Democrats

Summary

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant challenges in regaining favor after recent electoral losses, as only 33 percent of Americans view the party positively. The party's struggle to adapt and connect with voters indicates a pressing need for strategic changes to compete effectively in future elections, per commentary from American Enterprise Institute.

Center Right
Op-Ed
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

President Trump’s Tariff Formula Makes No Economic Sense. It’s Also Based on an Error.

Summary

President Trump’s latest tariff plan is under fire from a conservative think tank, which says the math behind it is both flawed and misleading. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) warns that the formula used by the White House drastically overstates the trade barriers imposed by foreign countries — and risks harming the U.S. economy.

Conservative
Commentary
·
U.S. Economy
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.