Cato Institute
·
Published
December 5, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • Both Republicans and Democrats agree on tax cuts, though they propose different types and have varied economic implications.
  • Democrats passed a nearly trillion-dollar corporate tax cut through the Inflation Reduction Act and support large increases in child and earned income tax credits.

Overview:

  • This article was written by Adam N. Michel, published on the Cato at Liberty Blog at the Cato Institute.
  • It discusses the bipartisan nature of tax cut support in American politics, highlighting the complexity of fiscal policy beyond partisan lines.
  • The piece also addresses the impending fiscal deadlines and the need for realistic budget planning.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Both Republicans and Democrats want to keep taxes from rising on the vast majority of Americans, and most legislators also want to protect higher-income Americans from punishingly higher taxes."
  2. "Policymakers’ instincts are correct; it is best to keep taxes low on Americans at every income level. However, keeping taxes low will require spending cuts."

What They Discuss:

  • The continuation of the 2017 tax cuts, supported by President Biden, which would cost between $1.7 trillion and $2.5 trillion.
  • The bipartisan agreement on tax cuts, with both parties proposing different types of cuts, yet generally aiming to reduce federal revenues.
  • Democrat-supported tax cut initiatives, like the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, estimated to cost around $1.7 trillion over ten years.
  • The fiscal challenges of extending the 2017 tax cuts without specific new taxes or spending cuts to offset the cost.
  • The projected rise in budget deficits to approximately $2.8 trillion a year by 2033, even with automatic tax increases post-2025.

What They Recommend:

  • The author suggests that maintaining low taxes for Americans at all income levels will necessitate significant spending cuts.
  • A call for realistic offsets and financial planning in order to reconcile the desire for tax cuts with the current spending levels and budget deficits.

Key Takeaways:

  • There is a general bipartisan consensus on the desirability of tax cuts, though differences exist in the types of cuts each party supports.
  • The extension of the 2017 tax cuts is a significant fiscal challenge, requiring careful balancing of tax policies and spending reforms.
  • The need for a realistic approach to fiscal policy that addresses the growing budget deficit while accommodating the bipartisan desire for tax cuts.

This is a brief overview of Adam N. Michel's article from the Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Summary
  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Summary
  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Reducing US oil demand, not production, is the way forward for the climate

Summary
  • Brookings expert Samantha Gross writes that reducing oil production in the U.S. will not significantly impact global oil production, as other producers can easily fill the gap.
  • Changing the transportation system from gasoline and diesel to electricity is key to reducing oil demand and greenhouse gas emissions.
Leans Left
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump wins Iowa — no surprises there. What happens next?

Summary
  • Trump's win in Iowa was expected, and he secured over 50% of the vote, performing well across various voter groups.
  • The race for second place was also as predicted, with Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley finishing second and third, respectively.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War
German Marshall Fund
·
Nov 18, 2023

Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The U.S. and Europe's pro-Israel stance in the war in Gaza, coupled with their response to Ukraine, is leading to global criticism and a potential shift in international relations, isolating them from non-Western countries.
  • This situation offers autocratic nations like China, Iran, and Russia an opportunity to increase their influence, exploiting perceptions of Western moral inconsistency and opportunism.
Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.