Brookings
·
Published
October 3, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.

Overview:

This written debate by Brookings experts, Cameron F. Kerry, Mary E. Lovely, Pavneet Singh, Liza Tobin, Ryan Hass, Patricia M. Kim, and Emilie Kimball, dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.

  • The debate explores the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, focusing on economic, diplomatic, military, and technological aspects.
  • It examines the implications of China's growth strategies and the potential responses by the United States.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is not the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) economic growth, per se, that poses a risk to U.S. national security, but rather the zero-sum means by which the regime in Beijing continues to achieve that growth, as well as the autocratic end goals that growth facilitates." - Liza Tobin
  2. "The time when the United States alone had the power to shape the trajectory of Chinese economic growth is long past." - Cameron F. Kerry

What They Discuss:

  • The debate addresses whether China’s economic growth presents a risk to America’s national security and if the U.S. should act to limit this growth.
  • It discusses the impact of China's economic tactics on global supply chains and market competition.
  • The experts consider the effectiveness of U.S. policies aimed at countering China's economic strategies.
  • They explore the potential consequences of slowing China's growth on U.S. interests and global stability.
  • The article also delves into the strategic importance of technology and innovation in the U.S.-China competition.

What They Recommend:

  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth.
  • Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
  • The U.S. needs to bolster its economic strengths and correct existing misalignments to compete effectively with China.
  • A more nuanced and targeted approach towards China is recommended, differentiating between China's rise and specific policies of concern.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate highlights the complexity of the U.S.-China economic and strategic relationship.
  • It underscores the need for the U.S. to adapt its policies to effectively manage and compete with China's growing influence.
  • The recommendations suggest a strategic focus on protecting U.S. interests and enhancing competitiveness in key areas.​

This is a brief overview of the debate hosted by Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Syria’s challenges are even greater than those Libya faced in 2011
Chatham House
·
Nov 18, 2023

Syria’s challenges are even greater than those Libya faced in 2011

Summary

Syria faces more daunting challenges than Libya did in 2011, highlighted by deep social divisions, a devastated infrastructure, and a complex geopolitical landscape. The situation calls for cautious optimism as Syrians navigate a new political reality following the fall of the Assad regime, per commentary from Chatham House.

Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change
Peterson Institute for International Economics
·
Nov 18, 2023

LA fires show the growing security threat of climate change

Summary

The fires in Los Angeles highlight the urgent security threat posed by climate change, which is reshaping national security paradigms. This disconnect limits the government's response to climate disasters, putting public trust and political stability at risk, per commentary from Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Center
Research
·
Climate Change
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Journalism needs better representation to counter AI
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Journalism needs better representation to counter AI

Summary

Journalism is currently facing significant challenges related to staff layoffs and the rise of artificial intelligence. As automation increases, the representation of diverse voices is at risk, impacting the quality and integrity of reporting, per commentary from Brookings.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

What Do U.S. Allies Really Contribute to the Costs of Global Security?

Summary

U.S. allies contribute more to global security than often perceived. Current NATO spending targets do not fully capture each country's capabilities and contributions, which differ widely, per commentary from RAND Corporation.

Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Nov 18, 2023

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.