Brookings
·
Published
October 3, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.

Overview:

This written debate by Brookings experts, Cameron F. Kerry, Mary E. Lovely, Pavneet Singh, Liza Tobin, Ryan Hass, Patricia M. Kim, and Emilie Kimball, dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.

  • The debate explores the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, focusing on economic, diplomatic, military, and technological aspects.
  • It examines the implications of China's growth strategies and the potential responses by the United States.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is not the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) economic growth, per se, that poses a risk to U.S. national security, but rather the zero-sum means by which the regime in Beijing continues to achieve that growth, as well as the autocratic end goals that growth facilitates." - Liza Tobin
  2. "The time when the United States alone had the power to shape the trajectory of Chinese economic growth is long past." - Cameron F. Kerry

What They Discuss:

  • The debate addresses whether China’s economic growth presents a risk to America’s national security and if the U.S. should act to limit this growth.
  • It discusses the impact of China's economic tactics on global supply chains and market competition.
  • The experts consider the effectiveness of U.S. policies aimed at countering China's economic strategies.
  • They explore the potential consequences of slowing China's growth on U.S. interests and global stability.
  • The article also delves into the strategic importance of technology and innovation in the U.S.-China competition.

What They Recommend:

  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth.
  • Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
  • The U.S. needs to bolster its economic strengths and correct existing misalignments to compete effectively with China.
  • A more nuanced and targeted approach towards China is recommended, differentiating between China's rise and specific policies of concern.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate highlights the complexity of the U.S.-China economic and strategic relationship.
  • It underscores the need for the U.S. to adapt its policies to effectively manage and compete with China's growing influence.
  • The recommendations suggest a strategic focus on protecting U.S. interests and enhancing competitiveness in key areas.​

This is a brief overview of the debate hosted by Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Shaping NATO’s Future: 5 Key Priorities for Washington to Build on After the 75th NATO Summit

Summary
  • Robert Benson at Center for American Progress writes that the 75th NATO Summit underscored the urgency of paving a clear membership path for Ukraine and strengthening Eastern Europe's defenses against Russian aggression, marking vital steps for the alliance's future.
  • The column asserts that Washington must ensure all NATO members meet their defense spending commitments and enhance cybersecurity to tackle sophisticated threats, while also expanding NATO’s engagement in the Indo-Pacific region to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.
Progressive
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.