Brookings
·
Published
October 3, 2023
Share this article

Summary

  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.

Overview:

This written debate by Brookings experts, Cameron F. Kerry, Mary E. Lovely, Pavneet Singh, Liza Tobin, Ryan Hass, Patricia M. Kim, and Emilie Kimball, dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.

  • The debate explores the complexities of the U.S.-China relationship, focusing on economic, diplomatic, military, and technological aspects.
  • It examines the implications of China's growth strategies and the potential responses by the United States.​

Key Quotes:

  1. "It is not the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) economic growth, per se, that poses a risk to U.S. national security, but rather the zero-sum means by which the regime in Beijing continues to achieve that growth, as well as the autocratic end goals that growth facilitates." - Liza Tobin
  2. "The time when the United States alone had the power to shape the trajectory of Chinese economic growth is long past." - Cameron F. Kerry

What They Discuss:

  • The debate addresses whether China’s economic growth presents a risk to America’s national security and if the U.S. should act to limit this growth.
  • It discusses the impact of China's economic tactics on global supply chains and market competition.
  • The experts consider the effectiveness of U.S. policies aimed at countering China's economic strategies.
  • They explore the potential consequences of slowing China's growth on U.S. interests and global stability.
  • The article also delves into the strategic importance of technology and innovation in the U.S.-China competition.

What They Recommend:

  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth.
  • Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
  • The U.S. needs to bolster its economic strengths and correct existing misalignments to compete effectively with China.
  • A more nuanced and targeted approach towards China is recommended, differentiating between China's rise and specific policies of concern.​

Key Takeaways:

  • The debate highlights the complexity of the U.S.-China economic and strategic relationship.
  • It underscores the need for the U.S. to adapt its policies to effectively manage and compete with China's growing influence.
  • The recommendations suggest a strategic focus on protecting U.S. interests and enhancing competitiveness in key areas.​

This is a brief overview of the debate hosted by Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.