Brookings
·
Published
January 16, 2024

Extremist Israeli settlers are nonstate armed actors

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Share this article

Summary

  • Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discuss the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
  • He argues that these Israeli settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.

Overview:

The article from Brookings expert Jeffrey Feltman discusses the escalating violence by extremist Israeli settlers against Palestinian civilians in the West Bank and the implications for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It argues that these settlers should be considered nonstate armed actors (NSAA) and suggests that the U.S. should take stronger actions against them, similar to measures used against Palestinian terrorism.​

Key Points:

  1. The article highlights the increase in violence by extremist Israeli settlers in the West Bank, particularly after the October 7 terrorist attack by Hamas.
  2. It notes that the U.S. has announced visa restrictions against Israelis and Palestinians undermining peace in the West Bank, but argues that more action is needed.
  3. The article suggests that the U.S. should treat extremist Israeli settlers as NSAA and employ mechanisms like freezing financial accounts and imposing sanctions.
  4. It proposes widening the target net to include American citizens involved in group attacks on Palestinian civilians and seizing assets of U.S.-based groups funding extremist settler groups.
  5. The article also recommends building coalitions with like-minded countries to coordinate multinational measures against extremist settler violence.​

What They Discuss:

  • Extremist Israeli settlers aim to drive Palestinians out of the West Bank, particularly from Area C, which is under full Israeli civilian and military control.
  • The Israeli government, particularly under the current Netanyahu administration, has been accused of endorsing the goals of these settlers and failing to prosecute them for attacks on Palestinians.
  • The article argues that the actions of these settlers constitute ethnic cleansing and pose a risk of igniting a third Palestinian intifada.

What They Recommend:

  • The U.S. should expand its mechanisms used against Palestinian terrorism to include actions against extremist Israeli settler groups.
  • Measures could include freezing financial accounts, imposing sanctions, and seizing assets of groups funding the violence.
  • The U.S. should collaborate with international partners to build coalitions against settler violence and hold Israeli government officials accountable if they aid and abet such violence.

This is a brief overview of the article from Brookings on extremist Israeli settlers as nonstate armed actors. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?

Summary
  • Recent developments, particularly Russia's involvement in Ukraine and its reliance on Iran, have strained its relations with Israel, marking a departure from the previously improving ties under Putin's leadership.
  • Russia's strategic positioning in the Middle East, balancing relationships with Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, aiming to be a central player capable of engaging with all sides.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How President Biden is appeasing bad actors
Texas Public Policy Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How President Biden is appeasing bad actors

Summary
  • The Biden administration's appeasement of authoritarian regimes in South America have not stopped the outflow of refugees and migrants trying to enter the U.S.
  • Lifting previous oil & gas sanctions on the Maduro regime in exchange for free elections have not worked, with Venezuelans now the fastest-growing immigrant group in the U.S.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.