Heritage Foundation
·
Published
November 2, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Share this article

Summary

  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.

Overview:

This commentary by Kevin D. Roberts, Ph.D., President, and J.D. Vance, U.S. Senator for Ohio, published by The Heritage Foundation, discusses the issue of U.S. aid to Israel in the context of the Ukraine war funding. The authors argue against holding up Israel's aid to further support Ukraine's war efforts.

  • They emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.

Key Quotes:

  1. "Having failed to force through more Ukraine funding by tying it to disaster relief for Americans, Senate leadership is now using the crisis in Israel as a 'Plan B' to get the Biden administration’s funding request across the finish line."
  2. "America cannot project strength abroad unless we are truly strong at home. Today, we honor this founding principle by standing with Israel."

What They Discuss:

  • The recent terrorist attack by Hamas against Israel, resulting in significant casualties, including American citizens.
  • The need for U.S. military support for Israel to respond to the escalating war and defend its people.
  • The assertion that the U.S. focus on Ukraine has come at the expense of other allies like Israel and Taiwan.
  • The strategic importance of Israel as a democratic U.S. partner compared to Ukraine's situation.
  • The need for a clear strategy and transparency in U.S. foreign involvement, especially considering domestic challenges and limited resources.​

What They Recommend:

  • Congress should debate and vote on the situation in Israel separately from Ukraine funding.
  • The U.S. should focus on securing its own borders and fully enforcing immigration laws, considering threats from terrorist organizations.
  • Conservatives should insist on strengthening the U.S. domestic industrial base and defending strategic interests.
  • The U.S. should stand with Israel in its time of need, honoring the principle of "peace through strength."

Key Takeaways:

  • The commentary calls for a balanced approach in U.S. foreign policy, ensuring that support for Israel is not compromised by the focus on Ukraine.
  • It highlights the importance of differentiating responses to distinct international conflicts.
  • The authors urge the U.S. to maintain its commitment to key allies and prioritize national security interests.​

This is a brief overview of the commentary from The Heritage Foundation. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

What is Russia’s role in the Israel-Gaza crisis?

Summary
  • Recent developments, particularly Russia's involvement in Ukraine and its reliance on Iran, have strained its relations with Israel, marking a departure from the previously improving ties under Putin's leadership.
  • Russia's strategic positioning in the Middle East, balancing relationships with Israel, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, aiming to be a central player capable of engaging with all sides.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

How the prospect of a second Trump presidency is already shaping geopolitics

Summary
  • The potential return of Donald Trump as President is influencing foreign governments' policy decisions, with some delaying actions in hope of better negotiations and others preparing for less favorable outcomes.
  • The uncertainty surrounding US foreign policy under a potential Trump administration is causing both allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies far ahead of the US elections.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How President Biden is appeasing bad actors
Texas Public Policy Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

How President Biden is appeasing bad actors

Summary
  • The Biden administration's appeasement of authoritarian regimes in South America have not stopped the outflow of refugees and migrants trying to enter the U.S.
  • Lifting previous oil & gas sanctions on the Maduro regime in exchange for free elections have not worked, with Venezuelans now the fastest-growing immigrant group in the U.S.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Should the US pursue a new Cold War with China?

Summary
  • Brookings experts debate the applicability of the Cold War analogy to the current U.S.-China relationship, considering the economic, political, and military dimensions.
  • While the U.S. and China are in a state of competition, it differs fundamentally from the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, particularly due to economic interdependence. China's rise and its political model present unique challenges, but it does not seek to overthrow democratic regimes or force its political model on others.
Leans Left
Research
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.