American Enterprise Institute
·
Published
January 18, 2024

Democracy v. the Constitution in the Trump Case

Conservative
Blog
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • AEI scholar Peter J. Wallison writes that the Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy, as well as the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.

Overview:

  • This article by Peter J. Wallison at American Enterprise Institute discusses the Supreme Court's decision to hear Donald Trump's appeal regarding his eligibility to become President again under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
  • The case presents a conflict between Trump's public support and the constitutional language.
  • The article explores the tension between democracy and constitutional limits in the context of Trump's actions after the 2020 election.

Key Quotes:

  1. "The United States is a constitutional democracy; the people have the right to vote for their leaders, but only within rules set by the Constitution."
  2. "The mere fact that Trump believes he has the power he claimed makes him a menace to all as President."

What They Discuss:

  • The constitutional debate over Trump's eligibility for the presidency based on his actions after the 2020 election.
  • The role of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment in disqualifying individuals who have broken their oath to support the Constitution.
  • Trump's alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and the implications for his eligibility.
  • The broader implications of Trump's actions for the principles of constitutional democracy in the United States.
  • The lack of public awareness about the specifics of Trump's actions and the role of the media in this context.

What They Recommend:

  • The article suggests a need for careful consideration of constitutional principles in deciding Trump's eligibility for a second term.
  • It emphasizes the importance of upholding the Constitution over popular support in democratic governance.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Trump case highlights the delicate balance between democracy and constitutional safeguards in the United States.
  • The decision of the Supreme Court in this case could have significant implications for the interpretation of constitutional democracy.
  • The article underscores the importance of public awareness and understanding of constitutional issues in democratic societies.​

This is a brief overview of Peter J. Wallison's work from the American Enterprise Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

What China’s Ban on Rare Earths Processing Technology Exports Means

Summary
  • China's decision to ban the export of rare minerals affects U.S. national, economic, and rare earth security, given that rare earth elements are crucial in defense and technology sectors.
  • The U.S. has and should expedite its efforts to address its vulnerability in this area through funding decisions to enhance domestic rare earth processing capabilities.
Centrist
Commentary
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough
Hudson Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Painful Lesson: Defense Is Not Enough

Summary
  • Hudson scholar John P. Walters writes that the October 7 attacks in Israel by Hamas showcases the need for a more proactive approach to deterrence beyond passive defense strategies.
  • Walters criticizes U.S. policy towards Israel, suggesting it has encouraged a passive defense approach and hindered proactive deterrence.
Conservative
Report
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Don’t Hold Up Israel Aid to Further Ukraine War Funding

Summary
  • Heritage Foundation scholars emphasize that the U.S. should not compromise its support for Israel, a key ally in the Middle East, in favor of additional funding for Ukraine.
  • The commentary highlights the distinct nature of the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the need for separate responses.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Someone Has to Lead
Center for Strategic and International Studies
·
Nov 18, 2023

Someone Has to Lead

Summary
  • The U.S. must keep leading the world in promoting global human rights, despite its flawed human rights record and internal struggles.
  • Progress on freedom in the world requires U.S. leadership, otherwise Russia, China, and other autocratic states will continue democratic backsliding around the world.
Centrist
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Is US security dependent on limiting China’s economic growth?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Is US security dependent on limiting China’s economic growth?

Summary
  • This written debate by Brookings experts dives into whether U.S. security is dependent on limiting China's economic growth.
  • The U.S. should focus on countering China's economic tactics rather than explicitly aiming to slow its growth. Policies should be developed to protect U.S. interests, particularly in technology and innovation sectors.
Leans Left
Research
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.