Brookings
·
Published
July 5, 2024

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Share this article

Summary

  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.

Overview:

This article was written by William A. Galston at Brookings.

  • The first presidential debate of 2024 has resulted in a noticeable shift in voter preferences, increasing former President Trump's lead by 2 percentage points.
  • President Biden faces compounded challenges from previous issues that have negatively impacted his public standing, which were intensified by his debate performance.

Key Quotes:

  • “Since 1976, the first debate of a presidential year has shifted voters’ preferences by an average of 2.4 percentage points during the two weeks following the debate, almost always against the incumbent president (or the incumbent’s party when the president is not running for reelection).”
  • “In the past three presidential elections, the first debate has moved voters’ preferences by an average of 2.8 percentage points. And because we are closely as well as deeply divided, with elections decided by small margins, changes of this size can be decisive.”

What They Discuss:

  • The 2 percentage point shift toward Trump is significant and has altered the dynamics between the candidates. Trump's lead grew from 1.5 points before the debate to 3.5 points afterward.
  • Due to larger margins in Blue states, Democrats require a substantial lead in the popular vote to win the Electoral College. Biden's 4.5-point margin in 2020 was barely enough to secure victory.
  • Post-debate, Biden's situation demands an improvement of at least 5 points in the popular vote to ensure an Electoral College win.
  • The debate exacerbated existing problems for Biden, including doubts about his age and leadership capabilities, high prices, and immigration issues.
  • Biden's inability to effectively defend his record has heightened concerns and has not stemmed the calls within his party for him to withdraw from the race.

What They Recommend:

  • The article does not directly provide policy recommendations but highlights the necessity for Biden to address his weaknesses and public doubts.
  • It implies an urgency for a strategic turnaround to regain voter confidence and secure his position in the race.

Key Takeaways:

  • The first debate has significantly impacted voter preferences, favoring Trump by enhancing his lead.
  • President Biden needs a considerable boost in the popular vote to win the Electoral College, compounded by existing public doubts and criticisms.
  • The debate has only intensified the challenges facing Biden, putting additional pressure on his campaign to find effective solutions swiftly.

This is a brief overview of the article by William A. Galston at Brookings. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along

Summary
  • Carnegie Endowment expert Nikita Smagin writes that the Gaza conflict has reinforced Russia's belief in the correctness of its foreign policy approach, particularly in relation to the Western-centric international system.
  • Russia views the conflict as an opportunity to further its geopolitical interests, especially amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Liberal
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power
Goldman Sachs Global Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power

Summary
  • Goldman Sachs Global Institute estimates AI could contribute 1.5% to annual productivity growth over a ten-year period, lifting global GDP by nearly $7 trillion.
  • U.S. and China are top AI competitors, but geopolitical swing states like India, Japan, Israel, UAE, and South Korea can form "innovation blocs" and cooperate with each other.
Private Sector
Research
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation

Summary
  • Hezbollah is a politically-powerful force within Lebanon, and now serves as Iran's equal partner and "most successful and lethal export".
  • While Hezbollah and Hamas are on opposite sides of the Shia-Sunni divide, both groups find common ground under Iranian support and being anti-Israeli, anti-American, and anti-Western.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump’s Disqualification: A Primer

Summary
  • Cato Institute expert Robert A. Levy writes that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts will be "concerned about political repercussions" if Trump is disqualified from running.
  • Levy also argues that liberal justices will likely lean toward allowing voting citizens to decide if Trump should be President.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.