Brookings
·
Published
November 21, 2023

AI can strengthen U.S. democracy—and weaken it

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Share this article

Summary

  • AI has the potential to improve election administration but requires vigilant monitoring for risks such as phishing attacks, misinformation, and potential bias in voter rolls.
  • Policymakers, advocates, and citizens need to stay informed about technological advancements to harness AI's positive potential.

Overview:

This article was written by Norman Eisen, Nicol Turner Lee, Colby Galliher, and Jonathan Katz and discusses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on U.S. democracy. 

  • This article explores the potential of AI technologies to transform democratic governance while also highlighting the risks it poses to election integrity.
  • It emphasizes the need for policymakers, advocates, and citizens to stay informed about technological advancements to harness AI's positive potential.

Key Quotes:

  1. "AI could revamp election administration processes to make them more efficient, reliable, and secure."
  2. "AI is already altering the way candidates conduct their campaigns and can democratize the public comment process.​

What They Discuss:

  • AI's role in improving election administration by identifying anomalies in voter lists and reducing the time for reporting election results.
  • The risks associated with AI, including phishing attacks on election officials and the potential for disseminating misinformation.
  • AI's impact on election campaigns, including the use of generative AI for persuasive communication.
  • Concerns about AI-fueled programs fabricating public comments and endorsements.
  • The importance of safeguarding democracy against anti-democratic actors and autocrats.

What They Recommend:

  • Monitor AI's role in election administration carefully to prevent fraud or disenfranchisement.
  • Address the risks associated with AI, such as phishing attacks and misinformation dissemination.
  • Leverage AI to democratize the public comment process and enhance citizen engagement.
  • Develop strategies to distinguish AI-generated content from genuine public input.
  • Emphasize the role of policymakers, advocates, and civil society in guiding AI regulation.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI has the potential to improve election administration but requires vigilant monitoring.
  • Risks include phishing attacks, misinformation, and potential bias in voter rolls.
  • AI is changing election campaigns and public engagement.
  • Safeguarding democracy against AI-related threats is essential.
  • Policymakers, advocates, and civil society play a crucial role in shaping AI regulation.

Disclaimer: This is a brief overview of Norman Eisen, Nicol Turner Lee, Colby Galliher, and Jonathan Katz's work from The Brookings Institution. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Summary
  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.
Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws
Center for American Progress
·
Nov 18, 2023

Project 2025 Compels Local Prosecutors To Enforce Extreme Right-Wing Laws

Summary
  • Lindsey McLendon at Center for American Progress argues that Project 2025 aims to dismantle the U.S. system of checks and balances, granting politicians, judges, and corporations increased control over Americans' lives by enforcing extreme right-wing policies through the U.S. Department of Justice.
  • The Center for American Progress asserts that Project 2025 would pressure local district attorneys to enforce severe abortion bans and other restrictive laws, exacerbating the maternal health crisis and reducing access to essential reproductive healthcare, particularly in states with already high maternal mortality rates.
Progressive
Article
·
U.S. Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump chose Vance to reinforce his message

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings writes that in selecting Senator J.D. Vance as his running mate, Donald Trump aimed to solidify his hard-right agenda, emphasizing Vance's alignment with Trump's core messages and MAGA base.
  • The article examines how Trump's choice of Vance follows the "reinforcing model" of vice-presidential selection, where the VP candidate strengthens the presidential candidate's message and governance, rather than providing a traditional ideological or geographic balance.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization
American Enterprise Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Putting Public Colleges on a Path to Privatization

Summary
  • Adam Kissel at American Enterprise Institute argues that public universities suffer from a culture of timidity in discussing conservative ideas and that privatizing these institutions could introduce market discipline, potentially saving states billions in subsidies.
  • The article advocates for states to wait until interest rates drop below 4 percent before attempting to privatize universities through an endowment/bond plan, suggesting this transition will lead to institutions better aligned with market needs and free from bureaucratic constraints.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Education
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
With AI, we need both competition and safety
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

With AI, we need both competition and safety

Summary
  • Tom Wheeler and Blair Levin at Brookings argue that the FTC and DOJ should investigate AI collaborations and transactions for antitrust concerns while simultaneously encouraging AI safety standards through industry cooperation.
  • They propose a model that balances competition and AI safety, advocating supervised processes, market incentives, and regulatory oversight to ensure AI companies collaborate on safety without undermining competitive markets.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.