Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
·
Published
January 10, 2025

AEI would print money for the Pentagon if it could

Bipartisan
Policy Analysis
·
U.S. Military & Defense
Share this article

Summary

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

A new commentary from the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft critiques the American Enterprise Institute's call for substantial increases to Pentagon spending, arguing it ignores the detrimental outcomes of past military interventions. The report asserts that a military-first strategy has consistently failed to achieve its objectives and has created further instability.

The issue:  

Pentagon Spending and Ineffective Military Policy  

The American Enterprise Institute claims a Russian victory in Ukraine necessitates over $800 billion in additional Pentagon funding, despite the Defense Department's budget already exceeding $1 trillion annually. Historical evidence highlights that increased military spending has not only been ineffective but has also contributed to humanitarian crises and instability, costing over $8 trillion since 9/11.

What they recommend:  

Need for a New Approach  

Quincy Institute experts argue for a shift away from a purely military-centric foreign policy, advocating instead for strategies that prioritize peace and diplomacy. They urge a re-evaluation of military spending in light of historical failures and current geopolitical realities.

Go deeper:  

Consequences of Military-First Strategy  

The Costs of War Project shows that America's post-9/11 conflicts resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and thousands of veterans suffering from injuries, all while failing to achieve strategic objectives. The report points out that Russia's current military performance in Ukraine reveals significant flaws, indicating that increasing U.S. military spending would not effectively counter a weakened adversary. Moreover, it calls for European allies to enhance their military capabilities to reduce reliance on U.S. forces.

This is a brief overview of a policy analysis from Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full policy analysis.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War
German Marshall Fund
·
Nov 18, 2023

Whose Ground Zero? Competing Perspectives of the Israel-Hamas War

Summary
  • The U.S. and Europe's pro-Israel stance in the war in Gaza, coupled with their response to Ukraine, is leading to global criticism and a potential shift in international relations, isolating them from non-Western countries.
  • This situation offers autocratic nations like China, Iran, and Russia an opportunity to increase their influence, exploiting perceptions of Western moral inconsistency and opportunism.
Nonpartisan
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
·
Nov 18, 2023

The Gaza War Has Convinced Russia It Was Right All Along

Summary
  • Carnegie Endowment expert Nikita Smagin writes that the Gaza conflict has reinforced Russia's belief in the correctness of its foreign policy approach, particularly in relation to the Western-centric international system.
  • Russia views the conflict as an opportunity to further its geopolitical interests, especially amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Liberal
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power
Goldman Sachs Global Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

The generative world order: AI, geopolitics, and power

Summary
  • Goldman Sachs Global Institute estimates AI could contribute 1.5% to annual productivity growth over a ten-year period, lifting global GDP by nearly $7 trillion.
  • U.S. and China are top AI competitors, but geopolitical swing states like India, Japan, Israel, UAE, and South Korea can form "innovation blocs" and cooperate with each other.
Private Sector
Research
·
Artificial Intelligence
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

On Hezbollah, Lebanon, and the risk of escalation

Summary
  • Hezbollah is a politically-powerful force within Lebanon, and now serves as Iran's equal partner and "most successful and lethal export".
  • While Hezbollah and Hamas are on opposite sides of the Shia-Sunni divide, both groups find common ground under Iranian support and being anti-Israeli, anti-American, and anti-Western.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing
Center for a New American Security
·
Nov 18, 2023

U.S.-China Competition and Military AI: How Washington Can Manage Strategic Risks amid Rivalry with Beijing

Summary
  • This report highlights the intersection of growing U.S.-China geopolitical rivalry and the rapid development of military AI and how the U.S. can manage strategic risks.
  • It discusses China's integration of AI into its military and civilian sectors, proposes ways for the U.S. to limit China's military AI progress.
Center Left
Report
·
U.S.-China Relations
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.