Cato Institute
·
Published
July 9, 2024

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.

Overview:

This article was written by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute.

  • Key insights provided include the assertion that cosmopolitan support for globalization can coexist with opposition to a global government and that world government could potentially lead to substantial negative outcomes including authoritarianism.

Key Quotes:

  • "World government would be dangerous because people harmed by its policies could not 'vote with their feet' against it."
  • “We don’t need world government to solve the world’s problems.”

What They Discuss:

  • The debate over world government versus global governance, typically conflicted between cosmopolitan supporters and nationalist opponents.
  • World government could undermine diversity and beneficial competition among nation-states, as illustrated by the proposed global minimum tax by the OECD.
  • Political ignorance would be exacerbated under a global government, making it harder for voters to be well-informed about global policies.
  • A world government could make it impossible for individuals to migrate away from oppressive regimes, eliminating opportunities for “foot voting.”
  • Historical and hypothetical risks of world government turning into totalitarian regimes, potentially with catastrophic results.

What They Recommend:

  • Address global problems through cooperation between a few major powers rather than establishing a world government.
  • Utilize voluntary agreements and unilateral actions to solve international issues.
  • Promote migration rights and reduce barriers to immigration without the global government framework.
  • Stay cautious of empowering institutions of global governance that may pave the way to a world state.

Key Takeaways:

  • Even proponents of globalization can reasonably oppose the concept of world government due to the potential risks it poses.
  • Risks include loss of migration opportunities, stifling diversity and competition, exacerbating political ignorance, and potential for totalitarianism.
  • Many global challenges can be addressed effectively through international cooperation without centralized world governance.
  • Safeguarding against the dangers of world government requires critical analysis and careful measures to ensure local autonomy and effective global collaboration.

Disclaimer: 

This is a brief overview of the article by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

North Carolina’s emergence as a swing state could help Biden win in November

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck and Deirdre Keenan at Brookings argue that North Carolina has become a key swing state due to significant population growth and shifting demographics, particularly in the Raleigh-Durham-Cary area, which is attracting college-educated professionals and new residents from heavily Democratic states, indicating a potential Democratic advantage in upcoming elections.
  • The analysis asserts that efforts by the North Carolina Democratic Party, led by Anderson Clayton, to mobilize young voters, re-engage rural communities, and contest every legislative race could generate significant momentum and potentially tilt the state toward a Democratic victory in the 2024 presidential election.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific
RAND Corporation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Russia Is a Strategic Spoiler in the Indo-Pacific

Summary
  • Derek Grossman at RAND Corporation writes that Russia continues to play a significant role in the Indo-Pacific, forging strategic partnerships with China, North Korea, and Vietnam to counter U.S. influence and distract from its invasion of Ukraine.
  • The article asserts that while Russia's influence lags behind China and the U.S., it remains capable of promoting anti-Western interests and destabilizing the regional order, drawing nations toward nonalignment rather than a Cold War–style bloc standoff.
Center
Commentary
·
International Affairs
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity
Cato Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Trump v. US: With Great Power Comes Great Immunity

Summary
  • Gene Healy at Cato Institute argues that Chief Justice John Roberts' ruling in Trump v. United States introduces broad presidential immunities, raising concerns about unchecked executive power and "legislating from the bench."
  • The article asserts that these new immunities could pave the way for presidential recklessness, with critics like Healy and Justice Sonia Sotomayor highlighting the lack of constitutional basis and potential abuse of power by future presidents.
Libertarian
Commentary
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden’s debate performance threatens his ability to win

Summary
  • William A. Galston at Brookings assesses the impact of first presidential debates since 1976, noting their significant but delayed effect on voter preferences, often detracting from the incumbent or their party.
  • Recent debates show a 2.8 percentage point average voter shift, critical in tightly contested elections. Following the Biden-Trump debate, Biden's standing dropped 2 points, heightening the challenge of securing necessary electoral votes.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Why an Open Border Means More Expensive Housing
Heritage Foundation
·
Nov 18, 2023

Why an Open Border Means More Expensive Housing

Summary
  • EJ Antoni at Heritage Foundation argues that the influx of millions of illegal aliens into the United States over the last 3½ years has significantly increased housing demand, leading to skyrocketing home prices as basic economics dictate that increased demand raises prices.
  • The article asserts that while many blame the housing crisis on government overspending and interest rate manipulation, few recognize the role of open-border policies in escalating home prices, highlighting that curbing illegal immigration is necessary for housing market stabilization.
Conservative
Commentary
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.