Cato Institute
·
Published
July 9, 2024

A Cosmopolitan Case against World Government

Libertarian
Report
·
U.S. Government & Politics
Share this article

Summary

  • Ilya Somin at Cato Institute argues that supporting globalization and opposing world government are not contradictory positions because a world government could worsen voter ignorance, hinder foot voting, and potentially spiral into catastrophic authoritarianism.
  • The article asserts that world government is unnecessary for solving global issues and could suppress beneficial diversity and competition between nations. Instead, voluntary cooperation among major powers can address international challenges effectively.

Overview:

This article was written by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute.

  • Key insights provided include the assertion that cosmopolitan support for globalization can coexist with opposition to a global government and that world government could potentially lead to substantial negative outcomes including authoritarianism.

Key Quotes:

  • "World government would be dangerous because people harmed by its policies could not 'vote with their feet' against it."
  • “We don’t need world government to solve the world’s problems.”

What They Discuss:

  • The debate over world government versus global governance, typically conflicted between cosmopolitan supporters and nationalist opponents.
  • World government could undermine diversity and beneficial competition among nation-states, as illustrated by the proposed global minimum tax by the OECD.
  • Political ignorance would be exacerbated under a global government, making it harder for voters to be well-informed about global policies.
  • A world government could make it impossible for individuals to migrate away from oppressive regimes, eliminating opportunities for “foot voting.”
  • Historical and hypothetical risks of world government turning into totalitarian regimes, potentially with catastrophic results.

What They Recommend:

  • Address global problems through cooperation between a few major powers rather than establishing a world government.
  • Utilize voluntary agreements and unilateral actions to solve international issues.
  • Promote migration rights and reduce barriers to immigration without the global government framework.
  • Stay cautious of empowering institutions of global governance that may pave the way to a world state.

Key Takeaways:

  • Even proponents of globalization can reasonably oppose the concept of world government due to the potential risks it poses.
  • Risks include loss of migration opportunities, stifling diversity and competition, exacerbating political ignorance, and potential for totalitarianism.
  • Many global challenges can be addressed effectively through international cooperation without centralized world governance.
  • Safeguarding against the dangers of world government requires critical analysis and careful measures to ensure local autonomy and effective global collaboration.

Disclaimer: 

This is a brief overview of the article by Ilya Somin at Cato Institute. For complete insights, we recommend reading the full article.

Related articles

All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
All Topics
Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Are convention delegates bound to their presidential candidate?

Summary
  • Elaine Kamarck at Brookings argues that President Biden's poor debate performance against Trump has raised doubts about his ability to lead, prompting questions about the delegates' role in deciding nominations.
  • The article examines the history of delegate roles in U.S. party conventions, noting that although modern delegates are typically bound by primary results, under certain circumstances, they may exercise more independent decision-making.
Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

Tracing the rise of Russian state media on TikTok

Summary
  • Brookings Foreign Policy Fellow Valerie Wirtschafter examines the growing influence of Russian state-affiliated accounts on TikTok and compares it with their presence on other social media platforms like Telegram and X (formerly Twitter).
  • Russian state-affiliated accounts are leveraging TikTok's reach to disseminate state-backed narratives.
  • Despite lower overall activity compared to other platforms, the engagement per post on TikTok is significantly higher.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
Ukraine-Russia War
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls
Brookings
·
Nov 18, 2023

How voters feel about the economy: 4 takeaways from the latest polls

Summary
  • Brookings expert William A. Galston reviews four recent polls of U.S. voters on the economy, comparing Biden and Trump on their economic records.
  • Sixty-five percent of voters rate the economy as good during Trump’s presidency, compared to 38% under Biden.

Leans Left
Commentary
·
2024 U.S. Elections
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops
Atlantic Council
·
Nov 18, 2023

The hard truth about Biden’s coming retaliation for the killing of US troops

Summary
  • President Biden's public statements on the drone attack that killed 3 U.S. soldiers in Jordan shows the U.S. is keen to avoid war with Iran while focusing on Hezbollah's activities.
  • The drone attack represents a significant escalation, marking the first US military casualty by enemy air power since 1953 and prompting a strategic withdrawal of Hezbollah from aggressive engagements with US forces in Iraq and Syria.
Leans Right
Commentary
·
War in Israel-Gaza
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative
Migration Policy Institute
·
Nov 18, 2023

Biden at the Three-Year Mark: The Most Active Immigration Presidency Yet Is Mired in Border Crisis Narrative

Summary
  • The Biden administration has taken a proactive approach to immigration with 535 immigration actions, surpassing the Trump administration in the number of executive actions.
  • The administration's immigration actions have led to legal immigration returning to and surpassing pre-pandemic levels, with refugee admissions on pace to reach the highs of the 1990s.
Leans Left
Report
·
Immigration
Read summary
(1 min.)
-->
No results found.
Original Read Time
9 min
Organization
The Brookings Institution
Category
Israel-Gaza War
Political Ideology
Center Left

We make expert analysis of current events
simple and accessible for all.

Join us in elevating our public discourse.